An error occured. Details Hide
You have unsaved pages. Restore Cancel

 

US tech companies are keeping lucrative US Department of Defense (DoD) contracts in their sights as indicated by growing attendance at DoD events. This is unsurprising given the rapid growth of AI technologywhich the DoD wants to use in predictive maintenance, process automation, and humanitarian assistance—and the DoD’s long-maintained reliance on private contractors.

  • According to the US Federal Procurement Data System, in 2017, DoD obligated $321 billion to contractors, which is more than all other government agencies combined.
  • Contract obligations of the department account for 43 percent of total national defense expenditures and 7 percent of total federal government expenditures, according to the US Bureau of Economic Analysis.

Tech company employees are less enthusiastic about participating in the development of military tech, rejecting the idea that these contracts help to make the world a better place. Statements and actions by corporate execs, however, show companies are less willing than their employees to walk away from DoD.

  • Last week, Microsoft employees demanded their executives, Brad Smith and Satya Nadella, cancel the $480 million contract the company won in November 2018 with the US Army to develop an Integrated Visual Augmentation System (IVAS). [Appears the demands failed.]
  • Microsoft's CEO defended the company’s military contract, arguing that Microsoft technologies help to protect freedoms. The assertion is not surprising given Microsoft's history contracting with the US military. According to the Federal Procurement Data System-Next Generation, which tracks US federal funds obligated on contracts, Microsoft was the seventh largest contractor of the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) in 2017; DISA in turn maintains the third highest contract value among defense agencies.
  • Apparently Google employees take a similar view to peers at Microsoft and were more successful. Last year, employees protested the company's contract with the US Pentagon to apply AI to identify potential drone targets from satellite images and Google dropped the contract. 

Related Data Insights

The 2017 Global Peace Index

The 2017 Global Peace Index reflects the reality of war and peace today with Syria, Afghanistan, and Iraq ranking as the least peaceful countries of the 161 evaluated for the index. The United States experienced the greatest decline in the index since last year, slipping 11 places to rank 114th, directly following Armenia and Rwanda and preceding El Salvador and China.But, what’s in the index? The Global Peace Index is comprised of 23 indicators grouped into three broad themes: the level of safety and security in a society, the number of international and domestic conflicts, and the degree of militarization. In the US...

The World's Nuclear Forces

Nine countries in the world are nuclear-capable: China, France, India, Israel, North Korea, Pakistan, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. As of January 2017, these nuclear powers possessed approximately 14,935 nuclear weapons, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI).Almost 40 percent of total nuclear forces are warheads in central storage that would require some preparation to deploy, such as transportation and loading onto launchers.SIPRI estimates that 27.8 percent of total nuclear forces are warheads placed on missiles or located on bases with operational forces. Russia...

Is NATO the Financial Burden of the US?

In July, after the NATO summit in Brussels, US President Donald Trump tweeted that "the United States is spending far more on NATO than any other country. This is not fair, nor is it acceptable." But, is the US spending more on NATO than other members? And, if so, is the US spending level unfair relative to that which the US—and the other 28 members—have agreed? Let's look at the data. Measure 1: Defense Expenditures. In 2018,* the US will spend an estimated $706 billion on defense globally. The US defense budget represents US priorities and spending globally and not money spent for or on behalf of NATO or for the mutual...

Global Firepower - 2016 | Data and Charts

Global Firepower (GFP) provides a unique analytical display of data concerning today's world military powers. Over 100 world powers are considering in the ranking which allows for a broad spectrum of comparisons to be achieved concerning relative military strengths. The Global Firepower ranking is based strictly on each nations potential conventional war-making capabilities across land, sea and air. The nuclear capability is not taken into account. The final ranking also incorporates values related to resources, finances and geography. The Global Firepower ranking is based on a formula utilizing over fifty different...